This survey is being conducted as a partnership between the South African Documentary Filmmakers Association DFA and the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property PIJIP at the American University in Washington DC, together with the Black Filmmakers Network (BFN). The goal is to assess the difficulties facing documentary filmmakers in South Africa when making use of copyrighted material – music, archives etc. – in their films, with a view to providing some assistance – as well as to ascertain Sourth African filmmakers attitudes toward copyright in general.
|
PIJIP has done some path-breaking work with filmmakers in the U.S. and other countries on “Fair Use” of copyrighted material. “Fair Use” (or in South Africa “Fair Dealing”) refers to circumstances under which it is permissible to use copyrighted material without paying or obtaining the permission of the copyright owner. An example might be the use of a news clip in your documentary to illustrate the way in which a news story has been covered by a broadcaster. Clearly it is important to achieve a balance between respect for a content-owner’s copyrights—which many documentary filmmakers depend on for their livelihoods—and the right to make use of copyrighted material—which documentary filmmakers often need to produce their films.
|
The survey aims to obtain both a general statistical response and qualitative stories and anecdotes about the actual and perceived copyright environment in which documentary filmmakers in South Africa work. The information aggregated in this survey will be published in a report and made generally available free of charge through PIJIP, DFA and BFN and other filmmaker organisations. (Note that comments you make may on this questionnaire may be quoted in the final report and may be attributed to you unless you ask to treat one or more answers as anonymous.). Analysis of the survey results and discussion of the way forward will be the subject of a special meeting in mid-March 2009 to which you will be invited.
|
Thanks for taking the time to fill in the survey!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We’d like to know what kind of copyrighted materials you use in your filmsand what kind of experiences you have had. Please give us some examples to illustrate your answers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives use two tools to control access to the material they own. The first is controlling physical access and requiring contracts to gain access; the second is using copyright law e.g. refusals to licenseengaging in enforcementetc. to attempt to restrict the use of material originating from archives but which has escaped archival control. We are particularly interested in the use of copyright by archives to control material which is already in circulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The previous section asked about problems you may have had clearing rights owned by others. In this sectionwe are asking whether your own work has ever been used legitimately or in violation of your rights. Please give as many examples as you think necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this section, we are interested in where you get information about the current status of South African copyright law, either from formal or informal sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here we want your views on how the copyright law affects your work. Please gives us any examples which are useful to illustrate your answers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This section is designed simply to assess the level of “copyright knowledge” among documentary filmmakers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|