Category Domestic Policy

Big Win for Open Access to Law – Georgia v. Public.Resource.org

On April 27, 2020, the Supreme Court decided an important case about copyright law and access to the law -- Georgia v. Public.Resource.org, Inc. At issue was whether the state of Georgia owns a copyright in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA). The Court held that it does not and that the code in the public domain. This case is a big win for the movement for open access to law. This movement runs parallel with the movement to make scholarly and scientific publications open access. I wrote about the relationship between these two movements in my article, The Movement for Open Access Law, and this case represents a big step forward. Kudos to Carl Malamud and the attorneys who represented him for having the courage of their convictions.

USTR gives South Africa a Special 301 Pass; GSP Sanction Unlikely

The United States Trade Representative’s Special 301 Report was published last week with one notable omission. Despite a concerted campaign by the International Intellectual Property Alliance, South Africa was not listed on any of the Report’s “Watch Lists” for its consideration of a sweeping copyright reform bill.

Supreme Court Rules Annotated State Legal Codes Cannot Be Copyrighted

The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 that copyright protection does not apply to annotations in state's annotated legal code. The ruling in Georgia v. Public Resource.Org affects 23 states, two territories and Washington, D.C. PIJIP Professor Peter Jaszi commented that “This is the beginning of the end of a long journey toward opening all judicial and legislative materials to the public – the modern stage of which began more than thirty-five years ago in the West Publishing cases. The struggle to open governmental information at every level of the administrative state continues.”

Eighteen Years After Doha: An Analysis of the Use of Public Health TRIPS Flexibilities in Africa

[Yousuf A Vawda and Bonginkosi Shozi] Abstract: As we observe the 18th anniversary of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) and Public Health, it is appropriate to take stock of intellectual property developments and endeavour to present a comprehensive account of the situation in the African continent in respect of the implementation of TRIPS flexibilities, specifically those regarding access to medicines. This research paper provides an overview of the extent to which selected African countries have adopted legal and policy frameworks with regard to TRIPS flexibilities, examines the actual use of these flexibilities in enabling access to medicines in those countries, and suggests some recommendations for optimising the use of the flexibilities in pursuing public health imperatives.

South Africa’s Copyright Amendment Bill – one year on

On 28th March 2019, South Africa’s Copyright Amendment Bill was approved by the upper house of Parliament in South Africa, the National Council of Provinces, clearing the way for the President to sign the Bill into law. The long awaited Bill brings the 1978 Copyright Act, adopted in a pre-internet era, into the digital age - rules regarding libraries, archives, education and research had never been updated during this time. But one year on, the Bill has not been signed into law.

Creative Commons South Africa Letter to President in Support of the Copyright Amendment Bill

[Paul G. West, Derek Moore, Klaus Beiter and J.A.K. Olivier] Hereto our urgent request for the signing of the Copyright Amendment Bill, as was passed by both Houses and sent to your Office for assent after it was approved on 28 March 2019. We wish to specifically address the significance of the proposed amendments to the South African Copyright Act for access to learning materials in schools and higher education institutions in South Africa. The proposed “fair use” provision and specific exceptions for additional educational uses are not only compatible with international copyright law (the Berne Convention, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), and so on). They also pass the three-step test of international copyright law, as understood by the majority of international copyright law scholars.

Fair Dealing and Emergency Remote Teaching in Canada

[Samuel Trosow and Lisa Macklem] In the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, Canadian post-secondary institutions are replacing classroom-based instruction with online teaching for the remainder of the Winter/Spring 2020 semester. ... As instructors grapple with the mechanics of making this unanticipated conversion, most attention is focused on how to use technological tools to accomplish this transition. Less attention is being given to copyright issues. We are worried that without some affirmative intervention in the form of copyright training, opportunities to take advantage of Canada’s broad fair-dealing rights may be missed. This article explains how copyright law applies to online course materials. We hope it will assist instructors, librarians, teaching assistants, students and administrators working in Canadian colleges and universities.

Coronavirus and Copyright – Or, the Copyright Concerns of the Widespread Move to Online Instruction

[Eoin O’Dell] ... in our race to go online in time to deliver classes to our students, we must not forget that copyright law continues to apply. In that regard, I’m delighted to note that recent reforms to Irish copyright law will make all of our lives easier. The Copyright and Other Intellectual Property Law Provisions Act 2019 (also here) [COIPLPA] amended the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 (also here) [CRRA] in various significant ways, in particular relating to online educational uses of copyright material.

Google Submission to USTR, re: South Africa GSP Review

[Google, Inc.] South Africa has made strong progress in crafting a fair use system that is closely modeled on the U.S. legal framework, including a four-factor test drawn from 17 U.S.C. § 107 that strikes an appropriate balance between the interests of authors, creators, and users. The adoption of fair use in South Africa would clearly benefit U.S. exporters, particularly when the alternative is a legal system that is less consistent with U.S. law.

WIPO Nominates Daren Tang as New Director General

[International Federation of Library Associations] The UN agency that manages the global intellectual property system – including copyright – has nominated a new Director General. As the current Chair of the organisation’s copyright committee – and as a modernising reformer nationally – he will bring a strong awareness of the needs of libraries to the role.

Why South Africa Should Resist US Pressure to Extend Copyright Terms

[Paul Heald] The current term of copyright in South Africa is life-of-the-author plus 50 years. But the US is pressuring South Africa to extend the term to life-plus-70. Since the US is a net exporter of copyrighted media, like songs, books, and movies, US copyrights earn billions in revenue yearly. The US wants to prolong this trade imbalance as long as possible and deny foreigners free access to older US works.

ARIPO Model Copyright Law: How Does It Score?

[Electronic Information for Libraries] In October 2019, the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) released a new Model Law on Copyright and Related Rights. EIFL reviewed the ARIPO Model Law against EIFL’s ‘Core Library Exceptions Checklist’ that sets out provisions that every copyright law should have to support modern library activities and services.