Yesterday, filings were submitted in a notice and comment process for the USTR’s “Special 301” program, which is a process through which the USTR unilaterally threatens sanctions on foreign countries for failing to adhere to U.S. demands on domestic intellectual property regulation (even when not contained in any international agreement). The submissions on behalf of various groups of public interest advocates argue that past use of the Special 301 program have: violated the World Trade Organization agreement; harmed the interests of poor countries in accessing affordable medicines; threaten medicine pricing programs abroad that are identical to state operated Medicaid reimbursement programs in the U.S.; and failed to adhere to global best practices on copyright polic.
PIJIP worked with academics, global health advocates, state health officials and copyright advocacy organizations file submissions, three subissions:
Mike Palmedo is the admin for infojustice.org, and he manages interdisciplinary research on copyright exceptions at American University College of Law's Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property. He has Masters degrees Economics and in International Affairs, and is an economics PhD candidate.
Comments Submitted to USTR for the 2011 Special 301 Report
PIJIP worked with academics, global health advocates, state health officials and copyright advocacy organizations file submissions, three subissions:
We have created a page here – http://infojustice.org/special-301/2011-special301comments with comments from some of the groups with whom we are allied. All comments received by USTR are being made available at http://www.regulations.gov (enter “ustr-2010-0037” in the search feild to access the Special 301 Comments).
Author
Mike Palmedo is the admin for infojustice.org, and he manages interdisciplinary research on copyright exceptions at American University College of Law's Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property. He has Masters degrees Economics and in International Affairs, and is an economics PhD candidate.
Share
Related posts
QUT Professor Endorses UK Push To Create Smokefree Generations
QUT Media4th November 2025 The United Kingdom Parliament is considering a bill aimed at making smoking obsolete, which has been
Christophe Geiger, Luiss Guido Carli University: Statutory Remuneration for Generative AI
Speaking at the Global Expert Network on Copyright User Rights Symposium on 16 June 2025, Professor Christophe Geiger argues for
A Paradigm Shift with an Uncertain Future: Prof Wend Wendland on the WIPO Treaty on Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge
On 25 September 2025, Professor Wend Wendland, delivered the 14th Peter Jaszi Distinguished Lecture at American University in Washington D.C..
Italy updates its copyright law to address AI
On September 18, 2025, the Italian Senate definitively approved the country’s first comprehensive framework law on artificial intelligence (AI). The
INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL, DERECHOS DE AUTOR Y EL FUTURO DE LA CREATIVIDAD: APUNTES DE LA FERIA INTERNACIONAL DEL LIBRO DE PANAMÁ
Por Andrés Izquierdo Durante la segunda semana de agosto, fui invitado a hablar en la Feria Internacional del Libro de
AI, Copyright, and the Future of Creativity: Notes from the Panama International Book Fair
By Andrés Izquierdo AI, Copyright, and the Future of Creativity: Notes from the Panama International Book FairDuring the second week