
QUT Professor Endorses UK Push To Create Smokefree Generations
QUT Media4th November 2025 The United Kingdom Parliament is considering a bill aimed at making smoking obsolete, which has been
Abstract: An explicit goal of the 1994 TRIPS Agreement was to secure export markets for a wide variety of knowledge goods in which industrialized countries had long held a competitive advantage. In more fundamental terms, however, the TRIPS Agreement sought to reshape the conditions of future global competition, particularly the extent to which developing countries could use intellectual property (IP) as a form of industrial policy in pursuit of strategic development objectives.
Twenty-one years later, the TRIPS Agreement has neither confirmed the worst fears of developing countries nor accomplished the greatest hopes of the developed ones. Instead, both sides have inserted important points of adherence and resistance to the negotiated global IP norms, thus destabilizing many of the Agreement’s implicit political and economic bargains.
This Article posits that legal innovation in the developing countries has enabled creative responses to the TRIPS Agreement by facilitating new domestic policy responses to the pressures of intellectual property harmonization. For my purposes, legal innovation is (i) characterized by the potential that the selected tools for innovation are sustainable within the local legal culture; (ii) fueled by a clearly identified national development purpose or strategy; and (iii) effectuated principally by local actors. I suggest that this new “coming of age” of the TRIPS Agreement is also characterized by the institutionalization of international obligations in competing policy spaces such as human rights, the environment and public health. In this regard, international IP norms have become the implicit, and in some cases explicit, subject of legal innovation in a broader scheme of national welfare planning.
Citation: Okediji, Ruth, Legal Innovation in International Intellectual Property Relations: Revisiting Twenty-One Years of the TRIPS Agreement (2014). University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2014; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-10.
Full text on SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2591531

QUT Media4th November 2025 The United Kingdom Parliament is considering a bill aimed at making smoking obsolete, which has been
Speaking at the Global Expert Network on Copyright User Rights Symposium on 16 June 2025, Professor Christophe Geiger argues for
On 25 September 2025, Professor Wend Wendland, delivered the 14th Peter Jaszi Distinguished Lecture at American University in Washington D.C..
On September 18, 2025, the Italian Senate definitively approved the country’s first comprehensive framework law on artificial intelligence (AI). The
Por Andrés Izquierdo Durante la segunda semana de agosto, fui invitado a hablar en la Feria Internacional del Libro de
By Andrés Izquierdo AI, Copyright, and the Future of Creativity: Notes from the Panama International Book FairDuring the second week
