Sean Flynn

Sean Flynn

Analysis of WIPO SCCR 41 Agenda: Day 2, Limitations and Exceptions

[Sean Flynn] This note provides analysis of the Limitations and Exceptions agenda item of the WIPO SCCR 41 Agenda, currently slated to be discussed on June 29-30. The Agenda calls for Members, IGOs and NGOs “to make general comments, with a focus on the Report on Regional Seminars and International Conference (SCCR/40/2), especially the sections on The Way Forward and Take-Away Considerations (pages 63-72).” It also invites “inputs on possible next steps, including the possibility of holding a number of regional consultations before the next session to further develop the understanding of the situation of the cultural and educational and research institutions at the local level, especially in light of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on them.”

ANALYSIS OF WIPO SCCR 41 AGENDA: DAY 1, BROADCAST TREATY

[Sean Flynn] The WIPO SCCR 41 Agenda asks for comments on possible next steps on the discussion of the Broadcast Treaty proposed Chair’s text. One needed next step is to address the Limitations and Exceptions provision. This provision currently is more limited than the exceptions provided under the Rome Convention and fails to incorporate any of the priorities of the Action Plans on Limitations and Exceptions on preservation, online uses, and cross border uses for libraries, archives, museums, education, research, and people with disabilities. This provision requires significant expansion to ensure that the Broadcast Treaty is balanced and does not harm the public interest.

ANALYSIS OF WIPO SCCR DRAFT REPORT ON REGIONAL SEMINARS AND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS (SCCR/40/2)

[Sean Flynn] At the 40th Session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, the Secretariat released a Report (SCCR/40/2) summarizing the year of work on the Action Plans on Limitations and Exceptions. That Report is subject to comment by Member States. This Note provides analysis of the Report that may be useful to Delegates and stakeholders participating in the meetings of the SCCR. The Report helpfully summarizes a large amount of agreement about the main problems and solutions that need to be addressed by the international system. These problems include a lack of exceptions in a majority of countries for: Preservation for cultural heritage; Communications in online learning and research; Cross border uses for education, research, and the activities of libraries, archives and museums.

South Africa Parliament Calls for Comments on Fair Use

[Sean Flynn] South Africa Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry has invited a further round of public comments on the Copyright Amendment Bill provisions to introduce fair use and expand limitations and exceptions for libraries, education and other public interest uses. The Committee invites submissions with reference on the expansions on the Bill’s provisions fair use and for other purposes in Sections sections 12 and 19. It also invites comments on additional sections of the Bill that may implicate the “alignment” of the Bill with the provisions of several international treaties.

The Temporary WTO Waiver to Fight COVID Must Include Copyright

[Sean Flynn] Over 250 organizations, prominent researchers, and experts support South Africa and India’s recent proposal to temporarily waive World Trade Organization (WTO) rules on intellectual property — including copyright — for the “prevention, containment and treatment of COVID-19.”... Most of the public debate on the proposal focuses on patent barriers to the production of generic versions of vaccines. Some commenters have proposed a way forward by dropping the non-patent issues. Research by the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property (PIJIP) helps demonstrate why the inclusion of copyright in the waiver is needed. One reason the existing TRIPS “flexibilities” for countries to issue compulsory licensing for patents is not adequate to scale up vaccine and treatment production around the world is that patents are not the only barrier. Access to industrial designs, undisclosed information and, yes, copyright is also often necessary.

South Africa Parliament Moves Up Copyright Hearing to Tuesday, August 18

[Sean Flynn] South Africa’s Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry, (National Assembly), announced to stakeholders today that it is moving the scheduled briefing on the Copyright and the Performers’ Protection Amendment Bills to Tuesday August 18 at 9:00-12:00, via a virtual meeting platform. The meeting is scheduled to include briefings by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition and by the Parliamentary Legal Advisor on the remitted Copyright and of the Performers’ Protection Amendment Bills. According to the Portfolio Comittee’s announcement, the presentations will discuss “the constitutionality of specific clauses and procedural deficiencies and on the process forward.”

South African President’s Reservations to Copyright Bill Not Supported by Law

The President of South Africa recently exercised his power to return the long considered Copyright Amendment Bill back to Parliament because of reservations about its constitutionality. Specifically, the South African President declared unconstitutional the provisions in the bill that would require contracts with creators to include royalty payments, the reversion of ownership rights back to creators, and the introduction into South Africa of a fair use right and other common exceptions to copyright. The move was immediately heralded by representatives of collecting management organizations, multinational publishers and music labels as a win for creators. In fact, the provisions declared unconstitutional by the President serve the interests of individual creators vis a vis these well-heeled intermediaries who lobbied extensively against the bill. This note analyzes the specific constitutional reservations given by the President for his referral and concludes that all of them are acutely unsupported.

Statement of Sean Flynn, Principal Investigator, Global Expert Network on Copyright User Rights, at the Second Session of the WIPO Conversation on IP and AI

I speak on behalf of a number of copyright academics that recently released a statement on Implementing User Rights for Research in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for Action at International Level... Many countries have rights to reproduce materials for research purposes that are broad enough to permit text and data mining to train AI and for other purposes. But many laws are inadequate because they are restricted to non-commercial uses, excerpts of works, or do not extend to the communications between researchers necessary to enable collaboration and validation.

WIPO Responds to Call to Act with New Tools on IP/COVID

The World Intellectual Property Organization has released two new initiatives and a policy statement on intellectual property and responses to the COVID pandemic. The new initiatives and policy statement respond to many of the issues raised in an earlier letter from a broad coalition to WIPO’s Director General asking for a clear stance on intellectual property and the COVID pandemic.

Implementing User Rights for Research in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for Action at the International Level

[Sean Flynn, Christophe Geiger and João Pedro Quintais] Last year, before the onset of a global pandemic highlighted the critical and urgent need for technology-enabled scientific research, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) launched an inquiry into issues at the intersection of intellectual property (IP) and artificial intelligence (AI). We and other members of the Global Expert Network on Copyright User Rights contributed comments to that inquiry, with a focus on the application of copyright to the use of text and data mining technology. This blog, and the article it is based on, describes some of the most salient points of our submission and concludes by stressing the need for international leadership on this important topic.